Sunday, November 25, 2012

Kemewahan raja Mekah yang melebihi Rasulullah SAW « Blog Peribadirasulullah


http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5138/5418941842_cd1e929671.jpg


http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/newsImages/gallery_images/THTC554A303_6.jpg


http://pictures.wayn.com/photos/800x/027097292_441095844.jpg


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSUePvge_0sH-L7Fv01jAuyYIqWywfuOxmBLMc-7Yx_OptuKRIAfA


http://peribadirasulullah.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/image004.jpg?w=178


http://peribadirasulullah.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/image003.jpg?w=457&h=249





Fwd: Al-Waleed bin Talal buys world’s first ‘Flying Palace’
 
Inside the world’s biggest private jet with 4-poster beds, Turkish bath… and a place to park the Rolls
 
http://peribadirasulullah.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/image002.jpg?w=300
In a space normally given to 600 passengers, the owner and his guests will enjoy five-star treatment from the moment of arrival. 
 
After driving up to his plane, he will have the car parked in the onboard garage.
A lift drops to the tarmac and a red carpet unfurls, with downlights to ‘give the impression of turning up at the Oscars’, according to Design Q’s co-founder Gary Doy. The belly of the A380 has been turned into a relaxation zone, including a Turkish bath lined with marble only two millimetres thick to keep the weight down.
 
Next door is a wellbeing room, with the floor and walls turned into a giant screen showing the ground down below. Guests can stand on a ‘magic carpet’ and watch the journey, a scented breeze blowing into the room.
If work really is unavoidable, the boardroom is on hand with iTouch screens and live share prices projected on to the tables. For conference calls, a business partner on the ground can be virtually projected on to the table to ‘join’ a meeting.
The five suites which form the owner’s private quarters have king- size beds, entertainment systems and a prayer room featuring computer generated prayer mats which always face Mecca . A lift shuttles between the plane’s three floors, from the private quarters upstairs, down to the concert hall, featuring a baby grand piano and seating for ten, and to the garage below.
 
There are around 20 ‘sleepers’ – the equivalent of First Class seats – for extra guests. According to the designers, the style is elegant curves and swirls of Arabic writing.
Al-Waleed Spends $176 Million to Outfit His A380
 
After dropping close to $320 million on his new Airbus A380 jet, Prince Al-Waleed of Saudi Arabia is spending another $176 million on ultra-lavish modifications, including a $60 million gold leaf paintjob. An unnamed German company is customizing the interior of the plane to include:
  • A lounge to seat a traveling entourage of 25 trusted aides;
  • A marble-paneled dining room with seating for 14;
  • A bar with curtains to mimic tents of the Arabian Desert ;
  • A fiber-optic mosaic that will depict a shifting desert scene;
  • A movie theatre with plush leather seats the color of sand dunes;
  • A series of bedrooms linked to stewardesses by intercom;
  • A gym with Nautilus equipment and running machines; and
  • A large silk bed designed to resemble a Bedouin tent that will be the centerpiece of the plane’s interior.
 
Reports speak of the decor as being “Lawrence of Arabia meets Star Wars.” Al-Waleed’s A380 will be completed in two years, and in the meantime he will cruise in his Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet.
 
PRINCE AL-WALEED BIN TALAL
Al-Waleed bin Talal was born to Talal ibn Abd al-Aziz, son of the founding King of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz Al Saud, and Princess Mona Al-Solh, Daughter of Lebanon’s first Prime Minister. He is Prince Talal’s second son.
 
Al-Waleed completed a bachelor of science degree in business administration at Menlo College in 1979 and masters in social science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University, in 1985. He was also awarded an honorary PhD from the University of Exeter. Prince Waleed’s children are: Prince Khaled and Princess Reem who are from his first wife, Princess Dalal bint Saud bin Abd ul Aziz. And Prince Najem and Princess Mona who are from Princess Deborah of Saudi Arabia, whom is one of Waleed bin Talal’s current wives. Despite being the nephew of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, he has stayed outside of the core of political power in Saudi Arabia , and instead built a large international corporation called the Kingdom Holding Company, through which he makes his investments.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Burma: Satellite images show widespread attacks on Rohingya « ALIRAN

Burma: Satellite images show widespread attacks on Rohingya

Attacks and arson in late October by ethnic Arakanese against Rohingya Muslims in Burma’s Arakan State were at times carried out with the support of state security forces and local government officials, Human Rights Watch said on 18 November.

More satellite images here
New satellite imagery obtained by Human Rights Watch shows extensive destruction of homes and other property in the predominantly Rohingya Muslim areas of Pauktaw, Mrauk-U, and Myebon townships, all sites of violence and displacement in late October 2012.
Rohingya and Arakanese residents of Pauktaw and Mrauk-U townships described to Human Rights Watch the sectarian attacks and arson that occurred in those areas on 23-24 October, which in some cases involved state security forces. Similar violence between Arakanese Buddhists and Rohingya and non-Rohingya Muslims, also involving state security forces, occurred in seven other townships in late October.
US President Barack Obama is scheduled to make a one-day visit to Rangoon on 19 November to meet with Burmese President Thein Sein and opposition leaders.
“President Obama should make clear to the Burmese president that the attacks on the Rohingya need to stop if the Burma government wants to avoid renewed sanctions and the suspension of renewed military-to-military dialogues with the United States,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
“This is crunch time because Burma’s failure to contain sectarian violence in Arakan State and hold accountable those responsible calls into question the Burmese government’s stated goal of becoming a rights-respecting, multi-ethnic state.”
In satellite images of four townships in Arakan State that experienced violence in late October and in the state capital, Sittwe, which experienced violence in June, Human Rights Watch identified a total of 4855 destroyed structures. These images show zones of documented destruction covering 348 acres of largely residential areas, predominantly home to Rohingya Muslims who have since fled and to Kaman Muslims in Kyauk Pyu.
The images, which were captured on 3 and 8 November, are not exhaustive and reflect damages in only five of the 13 townships that have experienced violence in Arakan State since June.
Rohingya from Pauktaw now at camps near Sittwe told Human Rights Watch that for weeks they faced hostile Arakanese mobs, sometimes led by Buddhist monks, who threatened violence against them and anyone else found selling or providing the Rohingya with food or other assistance. They said they repeatedly notified local authorities of these threats, but insufficient action was taken.
In late October, just prior to the violence, Rohingya were called to a series of community meetings held by local Arakanese members of a nationalist political party and local government officials apparently aimed at convincing the local Muslim population to abandon their homes.
On 23 October, when boats filled with several hundred armed Arakanese descended on the riverside Rohingya villages in Pauktaw, the Rohingya fled, fearing for their lives, and their villages were razed.
Displaced Rohingya and Kaman Muslims told Human Rights Watch that some members of the state security forces provided them temporary protection at various points in late October – for example by firing shots in the air to fend off hostile Arakanese mobs or by providing water and food to their boatloads afloat offshore who were being denied permission to come ashore in Sittwe.
But these instances of protection were offset by violence committed against the Rohingya and Kaman by other groups of security forces. For example, on 26 October, soldiers from Nasaka, a government border guard force under the command of the army, severely beat dozens of displaced Rohingya who had clambered off boats on to the shores near Sittwe.
The new satellite imagery shows near 100 percent destruction of Yan Thei village in Mrauk-U Township. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that Arakanese mobs armed with swords, spears, homemade guns, bows and arrows, and other weapons descended on the village on 23 October, and fighting ensued. The Rohingya were ultimately surrounded and overwhelmed, and survivors fled by land to an area outside the village. Gruesome casualties were sustained on both sides, including beheadings and killings of women and children.
After October’s violence, there are now more than 110000 internally displaced persons in Arakan State, nearly all Rohingya Muslims. “People are still coming every day,” a displaced Rohingya near Baw Du Ba displaced person camp told Human Rights Watch.
The displaced Rohingya populations from the sites of destruction depicted in the new satellite images are in dire need of shelter, food, water, sanitation, and medical care, Human Rights Watch said.
The displaced from Pauktaw have been forced to seek refuge in beachside coastal areas outside Sittwe, in treeless, makeshift camps under the hot daytime sun without adequate food, potable water, and other necessities. One makeshift camp with an estimated 1200 displaced persons lacks latrines and the group is subsisting primarily on donations from nearby Rohingya villages, which themselves struggle to survive. Some of the displaced had tarps for shelter bearing the logo of a United Nations agency that they said they purchased from local merchants.
Burmese security forces have restricted the access of international humanitarian agencies to the area and to even more remote coastal areas where others from Pauktaw are seeking refuge. Since their arrival some displaced persons reported they have been beaten by local security forces.
The displaced Rohingya from Yan Thei are likewise in dire need of aid, Human Rights Watch said. They are living in makeshift shelters outside their now razed village. According to the displaced, there has been no sustained international access at their camp, and government officials are not permitting them to leave the area. Burmese government officials have provided only a limited amount of aid.
Groups of displaced Arakanese Buddhists from Yan Thei have sought refuge in two monasteries in Mrauk-U town, where they appear to have received sufficient amounts of aid from the local Arakanese community. Unlike with the Rohingya, the government is not restricting the movements of ethnic Arakanese.
While violence had not affected Mrauk-U Township in June, there was previous violence in Pauktaw. According to local accounts, approximately 14 homes in Pauktaw were burned down in June. Villagers told Human Rights Watch the previous arson and subsequent threats and incidents of violence were clear indications of the risk of future violence.
“The satellite images and eyewitness accounts reveal that local mobs at times with official support sought to finish the job of removing Rohingya from these areas,” Adams said. “The central government’s failure to take serious action to ensure accountability for the June violence fostered impunity, and makes it responsible for later attacks not only when security forces were directly involved but also when they weren’t.”
The Rohingya have faced decades of state sponsored discrimination and abuses. Burma’s 1982 Citizenship Law effectively stripped the Rohingya of citizenship, rendering them stateless.
Human Rights Watch previously released satellite imagery showing extensive destruction of homes and other property in a predominantly ethnic Kaman Muslim area of the coastal town of Kyauk Pyu, identifying 811 destroyed structures on the eastern coastal edge of Kyauk Pyu following arson attacks conducted on 23-24 October. The area of destruction in Kyauk Pyu measures 35 acres and includes 633 buildings and 178 houseboats and floating barges adjacent on the water, all of which were razed.
Human Rights Watch investigations found that local security forces killed ethnic Kaman Muslims in Kyauk Pyu while soldiers from the Burmese army stood by and watched. Members of the Muslim community in Kyauk Pyu also attacked and in some instances killed ethnic Arakanese before fleeing by sea toward Sittwe.
“The Burmese government needs to get serious about addressing the root causes of the sectarian violence in Arakan State, including Rohingya statelessness,” Adams said. “The absence of accountability for this horrific violence gives a green light to extremists to continue their attacks and abuses.”
Background
All four districts of Arakan State – Sittwe, Maungdaw, Kyauk Pyu, and Thandwe – have experienced violence since June 2012. Violence between Arakanese Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims reignited on 21 October and continued to some extent all week in nine of the state’s 17 townships: Pauktaw, Mrauk-U, Myebon, Kyauk Pyu, Ramree, Kyauktaw, Minbya, Rathedaung, and Thandwe. Four other townships experienced serious violence in June and thereafter: Sittwe, Maungdaw, Buthidaung, and Toungop.
Many of the places targeted in October had not been attacked in the earlier round of sectarian violence that consumed Sittwe and other parts of northern Arakan State in June. The sectarian violence that erupted in Arakan State in June devastated both Arakanese Buddhist and Rohingya Muslim communities, both of whom lacked protection from security forces.
Read the Human Rights Watch report “‘The Government Could Have Stopped This’: Sectarian Violence and Ensuing Abuses in Burma’s Arakan State,” please visit:

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Kekuatan sebenar israeil terbongkar di dalam Al-Quran « Blog Peribadirasulullah

Kekuatan sebenar israeil terbongkar di dalam Al-Quran « Blog Peribadirasulullah

Kekuatan sebenar israeil terbongkar di dalam Al-Quran

http://sphotos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/32422_438940012822071_1816175375_n.jpg
http://sphotos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/402411_4010765948678_144656515_n.jpg
http://sphotos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/46028_4010468261236_1475608140_n.jpg

قبل آلاف السنين.. أخبر الله _عز وجل_ رسوله الكريم محمداً _صلى الله عليه وسلم_ عن فكر وأيديولوجية طريقة قتال اليهود للمسلمين بقوله: “لا يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ جَمِيعاً إِلَّا فِي قُرىً مُحَصَّنَةٍ أَوْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ جُدُرٍ” (الحشر: من الآية14).
 
(Orang-orang Yahudi dan orang-orang munafik) dengan keadaan bersatu padu sekalipun, tidak berani memerangi kamu melainkan di kampung-kampung yang berbenteng kukuh, atau dari sebalik tembok. (Sebabnya): permusuhan di antara mereka sesama sendiri amatlah keras; engkau menyangka mereka bersatu padu, sedang hati mereka berpecah belah (disebabkan berlainan kepercayaan mereka). Yang demikian itu, kerana mereka adalah kaum yang tidak memahami (perkara yang sebenarnya yang memberi kebaikan kepada mereka)
.
وقد نزلت هذه الآية في يهود بني النضير.. إذ كانوا يتحصنون في حصونهم التي ظنوا أنها مانعتهم من الله.. فبثّ في قلوبهم الرعب بعد أن ضرب المسلمون حولهم حصاراً.
وكذا كان
بنو قينقاع يلجؤون إلى قلاعهم يتحصنون بها لئلا يلاقوا المسلمين وجهاً لوجه..الآن.. يمتلك اليهود أسلحة متطورة رجّحت كفة الإسرائيليين العسكرية مقابل أسلحة الدول العربية المحيطة بها، كما أن مؤسساتهم العسكرية تنتج أسلحة ذات تقنيات عالية تصدر إلى الهند والصين وجنوب أفريقيا، فضلاً عن تسلمها صفقات أسلحة أمريكية متطورة كل حين.. مقابل عدم تمكن الفلسطينيين من الحصول على أبسط أنواع الأسلحة، وإغلاق مطاراتهم وموانيهم أمام أي دعم عسكري من أي دولة.
ورغم ذلك، إلا أن اليهود لا تزال تحكمهم نفس العقلية التاريخية التي كانوا – ولا يزالون – يفكرون بها، والتي تحتم عليهم تجنب أي مواجهة حقيقية مع أي شعب، ولو كانوا لا يمتلكون إلا الحجارة وبعض البنادق العتيقة والمتفجرات البدائية الصنع.
 
Terjemahan Google

Adakah ayat ini telah diwahyukan di dalam orang-orang Yahudi Bani Nadir .. Mereka telah berkurung di dalam benteng-benteng mereka, yang mereka fikir mereka Tuhan مانعتهم .. Keganasan Vbut ke dalam hati mereka selepas itu melanda umat Islam di sekeliling mereka sekatan.

Serta

Sons Kinka resort ke istana berlubang, kalau-kalau mereka menghadapi muka umat Islam untuk menghadapi ..

Sekarang .. Canggih memiliki senjata Yahudi outweighed senjata tentera Israel terhadap negara-negara Arab sekitarnya, seperti institusi tentera menghasilkan senjata berteknologi tinggi dieksport ke India, China dan Afrika Selatan, serta penerimaan senjata AS canggih tawaran sepanjang masa .. Terhadap ketidakupayaan rakyat Palestin untuk mendapatkan jenis yang paling mudah senjata, dan Mtarathm rapat dan Mwaném sebelum sebarang sokongan ketenteraan dari mana-mana negara.

Walau bagaimanapun, walaupun ini, bahawa orang-orang Yahudi yang masih ditadbir oleh mentaliti yang sama bahawa mereka adalah sejarah – dan masih – untuk berfikir tentang, dan bahawa mereka terpaksa untuk mengelakkan sebarang konfrontasi dengan mana-mana orang yang sebenar, walaupun mereka tidak tidak mempunyai itu batu sahaja dan beberapa senjata antik dan improvisasi alat letupan.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Demo LoNie: Kes Hina Sultan Bercelaru dan Pelik? Ahmad Abd Jalil atau Zul Yahya.. polis sedang memburu 2 lagi individu??? +Video

Demo LoNie: Kes Hina Sultan Bercelaru dan Pelik? Ahmad Abd Jalil atau Zul Yahya.. polis sedang memburu 2 lagi individu??? +Video

Kes Hina Sultan Bercelaru dan Pelik? Ahmad Abd Jalil atau Zul Yahya.. polis sedang memburu 2 lagi individu??? +Video

Setelah dengar 2 video tu, aku rasa aku pun mungkin silap, terus terima dakyah polis yang kata id facebook Zul Yahya tu milik Ahmad Abd Jalil sedangkan sampai hari ni polis langsung tak kemukakan sebarang bukti yang jelas menunjukkan id tu milik Ahmad Abd Jalil.
Mula-mula sekali aku nak minta maaf kalau ada yang tersalah persepsi lepas baca artikel aku pagi tadi "Pencerahan - Pasai apa pulak kita kena sokong Ahmad Abd Jalil yang sah Umno ni???"

Terutama sekali kepada keluarga Ahmad Abd Jalil pasai ada yang bagitau keluarga Ahmad tak berapa puas hati dengan artikel aku tu.

Cumanya, artikel aku tu berdasarkan persepsi yang aku dapat bila baca laporan yang aku jumpa dalam media baru dan aku yakin bukan aku sorang yang dapat persepsi macam tu.

Isu yang sebenarnya sekarang ni, betul ka id facebook Zul Yahya tu memang milik Adam Abd Jalil macam yang polis dakwa?

Sebelum tu, bagi yang belum tengok dan dengar 2 video kat bawah ni, elok dengar dulu sebelum buat apa-apa rumusan.
Video ucapan mak Ahmad Abd Jalil [Sumber:Facebook]

Video ucapan ayah Ahmad Abd Jalil [Sumber:Facebook]

Setelah dengar 2 video tu, aku rasa aku pun mungkin silap, terus terima dakyah polis yang kata id facebook Zul Yahya tu milik Ahmad Abd Jalil sedangkan sampai hari ni polis langsung tak kemukakan sebarang bukti yang jelas menunjukkan id tu milik Ahmad Abd Jalil.

Tambah-tambah pulak bila nampak cukup jelas macam pihak polis nak sembunyikan sesuatu dalam mengendalikan kes Ahmad Abd Jalil ni.

Aku rasa hangpa elok baca analisa yang blog Amenoworld buat, "Ahmad is Ahmad, Ahmad bukan Zul Yahya" untuk dapat lebih pencerahan, atau lebih tepat lagi keraguan berkenaan kes Ahmad Abd Jalil ni.

BTW, aku memilih untuk setuju macam pandangan blogger Amenoworld yang Ahmad is Ahmad dan Zul Yahya is Zul Yahya dan Ahmad Abd Jalil bukannya Zul Yahya. Sumber: http://cenangau.blogspot.com/2012/11/pencerahan-2-bukti-yang-zul-yahya.html#ixzz2Bvjnf1XI
Ahmad is Ahmad, Ahmad bukan Zul Yahya.
Problem, PDRM?

Bagaimana PDRM boleh kenakan 2 pertuduhan ke atas batang tubuh ahmad tanpa mengemukakan bukti bahawa ahmad ialah zul yahya? Itu persoalan penting tue.

Then, dua pertuduhan itu pula tuduhan yang serupa. Aik. Boleh buat dua tuduhan yang serupa atas individu yang sama?

A dituduh mencuri kepsi. Ikat jamin rm5k.
A dituduh sekali lagi iaitu mencuri kepsi. Ikat jamin rm5k.
Total ikat jamin rm10k. Tuduhan? Mencuri kepsi. Ikat jamin? Atas dua tuduhan. Jenis2 tuduhan? Curi kepsi. Aik..

Kronologi
1. Mula2 ahmad ditahan. Ketika dia ditahan tue time orang seme sedang sibuk2 nak cuti apa bagai. Rujuk sini.

2. Lepas tue kita dapat tahu rupanya ia berkaitan rapat dengan satu posting zul yahya. Rujuk sini.

3. Tatau macam mana polis boleh link kan ahmad = zul yahya. Hasil tinjauan aku ke atas fb zul yahya tue.. sebelum nama zul yahya tue kecoh2 aku dapati account fb dia memang semacam. Tapi takmo tuduh2. Apa yang membuatkan aku rasa semacam?

- Tengok usia dia. Lahir tahun 87. Ramai jek yang lahir tahun 87 minat politik. Tapi bukan itu jek yang dorang akan minat semata2. Dari fb dia aku tengok macam itu jek yang dia minat semata2. Aku terpaksa cakap, ini pelik. Takde ke minat artis kpop macam aku? Wakaka..

- Lepas tue komen2 dia. Hanya semata2 komen bab politik jek. Takde ke komen benda lain? Pasal makan ke pasal bola ke apa ka? Haram. Usah kata orang2 muda, orang2 tua pun tak komen pasal politik jek 24 jam beb.


Atas neh url fb dia. Nama yang tertera ialah Ibrahim Osman. Ini membuktikan bahawa zul yahya ialah account fake. Macam account yang diberikan nama2 artis. Ada kan nama artis ibrahim Osman? Zul Yahya? Dorang tue pelawak kan? Kenapa nama2 pelawak ini yang dipilih?

Aku tatau. Rasanya tak penting pun untuk tahu.

Yang pasti sekarang polis sedang memburu 2 lagi individu yang dikatakan menghina sultan johor. Satu tue dah lari ke thailand. Satu lagi sedang bersembunyik. Yang pelik kenapa Ahmad yang jadi mangsa sedangkan ahmad ialah ahmad, ahmad bukan zul yahya?

4. Then, keluarga ahmad mengeluarkan kenyataan dan menafikan sekeras kerasnya bahawa ahmad ialah zul yahya. Zul yahya ialah individu yang berbeza. Zul yahya memang bukan ahmad. Polis meletakkan tuduhan bahawa penahanan ahmad ada kaitan dengan status zul yahya tetapi polis tiada bukti untuk menyabitkan ahmad = zul yahya.

5. Selepas itu gerakan membebaskan ahmad pun bermula. Rekod, polis langsung takmo bebaskan ahmad pada awalnya. Mereka sedaya upaya cuba menahan ahmad lebih lama walaupun jelas bertentangan dengan SOP polis. Yang lebih pelik.. beria2 nak bicarakan di johor padahal ahmad tue dok kl. Bukan dok johor pun. Rujuk sini.

6. Kes ahmad juga mendapat liputan antarabangsa. Rujuk sini.

7. Mungkin disebabkan tunduk kepada tekanan media dan desakan orang ramai akhirnya ahmad dibenarkan ikat jamin. Itupun atas tuduhan yang kelakar. Kenapa kelakar?

Polis gagal buktikan ahmad = zul yahya satu perkara. Polis gagal kemukakan bukti ahmad menghina sultan johor menggunakan account fb ahmad sendiri, satu perkara lagi. Rekod, ahmad ada account fb nya sendiri sebelum semuanya dihilangkan secara tiba2 selepas polis menahan dia. Ermm.. motif? Tah.

Bahkan polis juga mengenakan dua pertuduhan yang sama, satu perkara lagi. Yang lagi pelik, selepas sehari polis membuat kenyataan media bahawa siasatan or bukti masih sedang dicari, rujuk sini, boleh plak polis tuduh ahmad berdasarkan komen zul yahya di facebook?

Bukan kah sebelum ini polis sendiri keluarkan statement bahawa kes ahmad sedang disiasat dan bukti masih dikumpul? Kenapa ketika itu tak announce yang ahmad ditahan disebabkan statement zul yahya? Kenapa selepas mengenakan pertuduhan baru nak kaitkan dia dengan zul yahya?

Rekod, family ahmad insisted mengatakan ahmad dengan zul yahya ialah dua individu yang berbeza. Aku percayakan family ahmad.

Ini la pandangan aku. Persepsi, bukan fakta. Analisa, bukan hakikat.

Aku suspect ini dibuat sebagai amaran keras kepada mereka2 yang ada niat nak jatuhkan sistem pemerintahan beraja sultan johor or mana2 sultan. Dewasa ini kita dapati ramai malaysians yang semakin terang terangan berkomen mengenai sultan dan raja. Mereka tidak segan silu mempersoalkan isu elaun, isu istana, isu islam, dan pelbagai isu2 berkaitan keluarga diraja termasuklah diri aku sendiri.

Penulisan2 seperti ini mungkin menyebabkan geng2 raja jadi takut or marah. Mungkin kerana aib terdedah? Masyarakat hilang respect? Lama kelamaan akan pupuskah mereka? Apakah rakyat akan memilih untuk menjatuhkan raja dari institusi pentadbiran? Apakah ini bermakna no more allowance? No more istana? Dan blablabla..?

So ini mungkin sebagai amaran keras kepada mereka2 yang mempersoalkan kedaulatan raja2 di malaysia. Which is kalau ko tanya aku, aku akan cakap tak cerdik langsung. Jangan sibuk ubah persepsi masyarakat. Masyarakat takan komplain kalau mereka dilayan dengan baik.

Cara nak ajar or asuh masyarakat ialah diri sendiri kena duduk di landasan betul, lakukan perkara yang betul dan sudah tentu sokongan juga akan lahir disebabkan melakukan perkara yang betul. Contoh, sultan kelantan.

Menghukum, menakut2kan, mengertak, memang berkesan tetapi bukan bertahan. Ibarat anak2 kecik yang didera. Time kecik tak boleh melawan sebab kecik lagi. Kena dera sabar jek. Menangis jek. Lama kelamaan dendam tersimpul. Esok lusa yang kecik tue akan besar. Yang besar itu akan tua. Keadaan berubah. Situasi berubah. Yang lemah akan kuat. Yang kuat akan lemah. Begitula kitaran hidup. Balasan akan hadir. Sebab tue kalau nak tawan rakyat bukan dengan persepsi tapi perbuatan.

Baik perbuatan kita maka baik la balasan kepada kita. Jahat perbuatan kita, sudah pasti balasan yang datang pun akan jahat juga sesuai la dengan kelakuan kita. Apa nak heran kan? Ini SOP islam. Bukan rahsia. Janji Allah swt. Tunggu je la. Bai.


"Segala pertempuran ditangguhkan sehingga selepas pilihanraya"

Demo LoNie Al Baqarah [28] : Bagaimana kamu tergamak kufur (mengingkari) Allah padahal kamu dahulunya mati (belum lahir), kemudian Ia menghidupkan kamu; setelah itu Ia mematikan kamu, kemudian Ia menghidupkan kamu pula (pada hari akhirat); akhirnya kamu dikembalikan kepadaNya (untuk diberi balasan bagi segala yang kamu kerjakan).

Aksi Datuk Azhar Ibrahim (BN) Tunjuk Punggung Dalam Dewan - YouTube

Aksi Datuk Azhar Ibrahim (BN) Tunjuk Punggung Dalam Dewan - YouTube

http://youtu.be/M1trWf2Arv0

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Sabahdaily: BN Khianati Janji PRK Batu Sapi?

Sabahdaily: BN Khianati Janji PRK Batu Sapi?


BN Khianati Janji PRK Batu Sapi?



SELEPAS Pilihanraya Kecil Batu Sapi pada 4 November 2010, penduduk Kampung Lupak Meluas terus menanti Kerajaan Barisan Nasional menunaikan segala janji yang dilafazkan daripada 'lidah tidak bertulang' pemimpin UMNO; sehinggalah mereka sedar bahawa segala janji berkenaan hanyalah 'janji kosong' setelah mereka akhirnya menjadi pelarian di tanah air mereka sendiri.

Jurucakap penduduk Kampung Lupak Meluas, Daniel Abdul Ganih, ketika menghubungi Sabahkini.net pagi tadi mengesahkan bahawa tidak ada satu janji yang dibuat pada PRK Batu Sapi ditunaikan Kerajaan Barisan Nasional sehingga ke hari ini.

"Malah kami dihalau keluar daripada tanah yang kami duduki oleh pemilik tanah setelah Kerajaan BN gagal menunaikan janji membina rumah PPR di tapak yang sebelum ini diwartakan untuk penempatan semula penduduk Lupak Meluas," kata Daniel yang memaklumkan bahawa papantanda janji BN masih berdiri teguh berhampiran tapak cadangan perumahan PPR berkenaan.

Kata Daniel, selepas PRK Batu Sapi, hanya Pesuruhjaya PAS Batu Sapi, Haji Hamzah Abdullah yang datang menjenguk dan membantu mereka setelah pihak tertentu dalam Parti Keadilan Rakyat menipu dan menggelapkan wang saguhati yang dijanjikan kepada mereka oleh pemilik tanah yang dijadikan tapak rumah mereka selepas Kampung Lupak Meluas terbakar.

Dengan bantuan Haji Hamzah, mereka berjaya mendapat sedikit saguhati untuk membolehkan mereka membuka rumah mereka dan mencari tapak baru bagi membolehkan mereka mendirikan rumah baru setelah tidak ada walau seorang pemimpin BN sudi melayan rayuan dan aduan mereka setelah menerima notis perintah mengosongkan tanah daripada mahkamah.

Tetapi kata Daniel, mereka kesal disebabkan ada pihak yang mengambil kesempatan menangguk di air keruh terus menekan mereka agar membayar sejumlah tertentu sebelum boleh membina rumah di kawasan baru sekalipun pemilik tanah telah memberikan mereka kebenaran dan menerima bayaran sewa.

"Malah Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Ketua Menteri Sabah, Adun Sekong dan para pemimpin BN amat mengetahui masalah kami, tetapi tidak ada yang turun padang membantu kami," kata Daniel yang kesal kerana mereka hanya dijadikan umpan untuk mengundi dan memenang BN dalam PRK yang amat genting berkenaan.

Kata Daniel, beliau amat menyesal berkempen bagi pihak BN dan memujuk masyarakat Bajau menyokong BN pada PRK berkenaan sehingga calon BN yang tidak pernah menjejakkan kaki berkenaan ke kampungnya mendapat undi majoriti.

"Selepas PRK Batu Sapi, kami berulang kali mengemukakan masalah ini kepada Datin Linda dan Datuk Samsuddin, tetapi rayuan kami tidak pernah dilayan," kata Daniel lagi.

Menurut Daniel, projek merekabentuk, membina dan menyiapkan 180 unit rumah pangsa 5 tingkat 'walk-up' dan kerja-kerja berkaitan dengannya bagi Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) di atas P.T.2010070049 Kampung Lupak Meluas, Batu Sapi, Sandakan telah diluluskan oleh Jabatan Perumahan Negara, Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan, Putrajaya.

"Kontraktorpun telah dilantik iaitu kontraktor Para Cemerlang Sdn.Bhd. Tetapi sehingga ke hari ini hanya papan tanda yang berdiri, tetapi rumah kami pula yang dirobohkan," kata Daniel dengan nada kesal kerana Kerajaan BN umpama habis madu sepah dibuang.

Oleh: SAMSIAH LAMSAH (sabhakini)